Who were the homosexuals in the Bible? Jesus said this: “For there are eunuchs who were born so from
their mother’s womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs
for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. To him who can comprehend, that is enough.” (Matthew 19:12 Lamsa). The
Aramaic word m'haym-ne (plural)
is translated as eunuchs here, but the root meanings of this word in this form are: trusted ones, faithful ones and
believers. These "trusted ones" were also servants such as chamberlains, eunuchs and officers. In addition, m’haym-ne
meant homosexual men because they were trusted around women that were married or were not
of their family. They weren’t a threat in committing adultery with other mens' wives or in having pre marital sex with
the women of the nation.
The born eunuchs in the above verse from Matthew are referring to homosexual men. The second
part of the verse says: "and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by
men;" These would be the man-made or castrated eunuchs. Also, the eunuchs
who were made eunuchs by men were those appointed by the king to be servants
in the king’s palace. Some of these were prisoners of war, captives, and exiles (Isaiah 39:7 Lamsa). The third part of this verse should be read as: "and
there are believers who made themselves celibates for the
sake of the kingdom of heaven."
Throughout the ancient nations that included Egypt, Babylon, Assyria and Persia; homosexuals were exalted to such positions
as eunuchs that watched the women of the harem. Because of the mistrust of men, heterosexual or bi-sexual men were castrated;
but homosexual men didn’t need to be. Eunuchs also had a recognized place in homosexual prostitution, and youths chosen
as catamitic favorites were sometimes castrated. Homosexuality was long confused with eunuchry. Like effeminacy and hermaphroditism,
eunuchry was sometimes thought of as creating a woman-man. The following verses will show that the Bible defines the trusted
ones (or eunuchs) as homosexual men.
“Now God had brought Daniel into favour and tender [love]
with the prince (sar- ruler captain) of the eunuchs.” (Daniel 1:9 KJV). The first
underlined word is from the Hebrew word khe-sed,which means loving-kindness,
mercy and favor, and is translated as favour in this verse. The second underlined word is from the Hebrew word ra-kha-mim, which is translated as tender love here,
but means love. Daniel was given favor and love
(plural) in the presence of the prince of the eunuchs. Most likely the intimate word ra-kha-mim,
meaning love, was given to Daniel because he was handsome (See Dan. 1:4).
A second evidence where
the Bible shows that eunuchs are gay men is in (Daniel 14:2 NAB), which says: "Daniel was the
king's favorite and was held in higher esteem than any of the friends of the king." In the Aramaic
Old Testament, the word friends is replaced with the Aramaic word raḥ-maw, which means "lovers of him [i.e. the king]." Raḥ-maw
is from the singular Aramaic word raḥ-ma (or raḥme),
which means love. Chapters 13-14 are in the Catholic canon of scripture. The Aramaic Old Testament contains fourteen chapters
of Daniel. The Aramaic text of Daniel also has “the song of the three children” (Or, “Prayer of Hananiah
and his companions” – Aramaic name for that portion) after verse twenty-three of Chapter Three. Dr. Lamsa, being
a Protestant, just left out the additional parts of Daniel and Esther, plus the Deuterocanonical books. Dr. Lamsa did insert
an extra sentence in verse 23 that is not in the Masoretic text, but in the Aramaic and Greek text of Daniel.
The translators of the New American
Bible translated the Greek word sym-bi-o-tes as favorite, but that is incorrect.
to Liddell & Scott means: one who lives with, companion. That matches with the Aramaic text, which says that Daniel...was
living with the king.
The additional words
or text found in the Old Testament book of Daniel in both the Aramaic and Greek texts are probably not inspired. I included
this verse from the Aramaic text to show that an Aramaic speaker would have understood eunuchs to be active homosexual men;
as they were often the king’s lovers. Boga (or Bagoas
Greek pronunciation) was the eunuch lover of Darius the Persian and eventually became the lover of Alexander the Great.
There is good reason to believe the so-called Deuterocanonical books are inspired (at least most of them) but no good reason
to believe the additions to Esther and Daniel are inspired. These additions are not in the original Hebrew text of either
Esther or Daniel.
THE FOLLOWING SHOWS WHERE SARIS APPEARS IN THE BIBLE. SINCE IT ISN’T
ALWAYS TRANSLATED AS EUNUCH IN THE ENGLISH BIBLE LIKE IT IS IN THE GREEK BIBLE.
In the Hebrew Old Testament, the word sa-ris is translated a couple ways in the NKJV
Old Testament. It is translated as
eunuch and officer. The KJV also translated sa-ris as a chamberlain. It is also left untranslated
with an additional word as Rabsa-ris (Rab saris KJV),
which means chief eunuch. The Hebrew word sa-ris is translated as m'haym-na in the Aramaic Old Testament, with the exception of two places, which
are in bold print below. Dr. George Lamsa translated the word m'haym-na
as officer and eunuch in his English Translation of the Aramaic Bible (Old and New Testament). The following shows
where the words sa-ris and m’haym-na
appear in the Bible.
Gen. 37:36; 39:1; 40:2; 40:7; 1Sam. 8:15; 1Kings
22:9; 2 Kings 8:6; 9:32; 18:17; 20:18; 23:11; 24:12; 24:15; 25:19; 1Chr. 28:1; 2 Chr. 18:8;
Judith 12:11; Esther 1:10; 1:12; 1:15; 2:3; 2:14; 2:15; 2:21; 4:4; 4:5; 6:2; 6:14; 7:9; Esther
Additions A:12,14,17; Wisdom 3:14; Sirach 20:3; 30:20; Isa. 39:7; 56:3; 56:4; Jer. 29:2; 34:19;
38:7; 39:3; 39:13; 41:16; 52:25; Dan. 1:3; 1:7; 1:8; 1:9; 1:10; 1:11; 1:18.
The NAB dishonestly translates the word “eunuch” as “afflicted man” from the Greek text of Sirach
30:20; plus deletes words.)
ARAMAIC WORD M'HAYM-NA TRANSLATED AS: Eunuch
Matthew 19:12 & Acts
Now, is this verse taken out of context?: “For there are eunuchs who were born so from their mother’s
womb; and there are eunuchs who were made eunuchs by men; and there are eunuchs who made themselves eunuchs for the sake of
the kingdom of heaven. To him who can comprehend, that is enough.” (Matthew 19:12 Lamsa). This verse is found
when Jesus is speaking about marriage between a man and a woman. Then Jesus goes on and quotes this verse talking about people
that it wouldn’t be good for them to marry because of the way they were born, or because of a situation, or because
of their choice. - In order to get a correct interpretation of a verse, you have to know the definition of words and the way
the verse is used in the context. But also, in regards to the New Testament Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, & John), Jesus a lot of times changed the subject
in his teaching or when he was asked questions. Some of his words may appear to be out of context to a reader when they are
not. So we have to go by the definitions for the word m'haym-na-
Eunuch. Now this verse is actually not out-of-context in regards to males that it wouldn’t be good for them to marry
a woman (wife). It would not be good for a homosexual male to marry a woman because he lacks the sexual perophone receptors
that enable him to be attracted to women. It should be noted that a homosexual is impotent toward a woman. The other two reasons
why a male wouldn’t be able to marry a woman are obvious by the meaning of the word m’haym-na and its associations.
Another thing that needs to be pointed out is Jesus’ last statement in
verse twelve. He said this about the eunuchs that it wouldn’t be good for them to marry a woman: “…To
him who can receive (or accept) [it], shall receive
(or accept) [it]." The last part is usually written
elliptically as "let him receive it." The word spaq
means "to receive, accept," when it accompanies the word mil-tha
[word, statement, saying, message] (see Jn. 8:37). It also appears in the previous verse when Jesus says: "...not
every man accepts (sa-peq) [or
shall be accepting] this saying (mil-tha)
but to whom it is given." (Jn. 19:11). However, it literally and mostly means “to be sufficient, enough, adequate; to suffice” (See Deut. 3:26; Matt. 6:34;
Jn. 6:7, etc.). Jesus may have meant all three of those meanings with his use of the word spaq.
This last statement is written (or constructed) the same way as Jesus' other statements of "he that has ears to
hear, let him hear" or "he that has eyes to see, let him see." I don't see any reason to translate
one of spaq's meanings for the first occurrence and then
one of its other meanings for the second occurrence as Dr. Lamsa translated that statement as "..to him who can
comprehend, that is enough.” I also don't believe "comprehend"
is a good translation for spaq in any of the Biblical Scriptures.
Spaq was translated into Greek as cho-reo “to receive” (KJV) or can mean “to receive with the mind, accept" (NKJV).
Lastly, it is unlikely that Jesus’ reference to a born eunuch is referring to a straight impotent man. I can’t picture a straight man accepting his impotence
or seeing his situation as being sufficient if he is lusting after a woman. Also, a lot of gay men marry women
because they don’t know the truth about what the Hebrew and Aramaic Bible teaches. A lot of the men that are impotent
toward their wives are homosexuals.
COMPENDIOUS SYRIAC DICTIONARY
m'hay-man-tha a believer,
a Christian, faithful, trustworthy, an eunuch
(Syriac Dictionary, edited by J. Payne Smith 1998, pg 255).
This Syriac Dictionary
stops short of defining m’haym-na as an effeminate,
but it does define the phrase “man of the woman” (gwar ni-sha-ya)
as meaning: an hermaphrodite, a eunuch, effeminate.
(Syriac Dictionary, edited by J. Payne Smith 1998, pg 59).
Language Lexicons (or Dictionaries) don’t always give all the meanings of a word. If we go by only the definitions given
by this Syriac Dictionary, then we would have a hard time understanding what Jesus meant by his use of “born eunuchs.”
See the Appendix to get proof of the definitions for the word m’haym-na (translated as eunuch). I also cover certain beliefs about eunuchs that are
accepted, that may not be false, but that the Bible does not support as absolute truth regarding eunuchs. Pictures of eunuchs
are shown with information under the "Eunuchs" tab..
Is the Bible Against Homosexuality? by Mattai
"the Preacher" © 2015. All rights reserved.